Search for: "Judith S. v Howard S." Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 10:33 am
Judith Howard (NFP) - "Boorom raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the trial court erred in entering judgment on a jury's verdict and award of damages for personal injuries because the jury improperly included compensation for attorney's fees within that award. * * * The record specifically reflects medical expenses and lost wages totaling more than $12,000.00. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s decision in Evenwel v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
When complete, a marble flooring on the ground level will contain an etched "V/C" emblem. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
” John Fritze of The Baltimore Sun reports on Shapiro v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 11:02 am
Robert Howard and Lynn Howard, et al., a 12-page opinion on a petition for rehearing, Judge Robb writes:We grant the petition for rehearing, vacate our earlier decision, and consider the merits of the issue raised by INDOT's appeal: whether the trial court properly set aside its prior entry of summary judgment. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:12 am by Anna Christensen
Following Tuesday’s Second Circuit decision in Fox v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:00 am by Thomas Walton
Quigley 26,750 87,512 0 0 114,262 Philip J Quigley* 45,000 0 18,063 80,000 143,063 Howard V. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The Blogs Judith Townend’s consistently interesting Meeja Law blog has a post about the “Chandler super-injunction” quoting the BBC World News Editor’s comment that there is no public interest in breaking the law, simply to claim a scoop. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]