Search for: "Junior v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
No prizes for guessing which counsel represented Lucasfilm.What's your advice for junior IP practitioners bringing cases in Supreme Court? [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:15 pm
The US has tightened rules on Chinese state media organisations, accusing them of “propaganda”. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:26 am
” In the Stanford Daily, Hiroko Sunamura reports on the university’s response to the Court’s holding in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:39 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:50 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Ameritech, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:20 am
Quirky Question #216: A junior member of our marketing department left to join a competitor. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:30 am
Facts Jazz Resources Inc. is a publicly-traded junior mining company that owned a mineral tenure in B.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
In a decision captioned Beal bank, SSB v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
In a decision captioned Beal bank, SSB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
Seuss Enters., L.P. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm
State v Casillas. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
[By Venkat with comments from Eric] Eagle v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
State College Area School Dist. (2001). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:22 pm
Authored by Gena Usenheimer Earlier today, in Pippins v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm
The Constitution says that Congress (and the States) may not abridge the right to free speech. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
