Search for: "Just v. Chambers"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,569
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm
" But again who is making this determination—which is incredibly subjective if some non-legally trained clerk office staff (or even judicial chambers) is making a determination that "the remedy sough has implication beyond the parties before the court. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:12 pm
No need for an echo chamber. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
(Just to be clear: I’m not surprised.) [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
(Even at an event staged precisely to show that an Article V convention would not run away, delegates could not resist the temptation to do just that.) [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
A vote on the final rule is expected by April 2024, with legal challenges likely to follow – the Chamber of Commerce has stated that it will sue the FTC if the rule goes forward. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Additionally, these decisions have not been affirmed by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, the rulings of which carry greater authority. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
The case is Hanson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 2:47 am
Halet v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Just over half (27) of those final rules are technical and of limited general interest. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 2:57 am
Case-notes DLA Piper has just published a series of notes on leading cases on religion/belief and employment law: Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd and Garden Court Chambers (2020) Fahmy v Arts Council England (2023) Furlong v The Chief Constable of Cheshire Police (2019) Grainger Plc and others v Nicholson (2010) Higgs v Farmor’s School (2023) Joanna Phoenix v Open University (2024) Ladele v London Borough of… [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Mr Fox was just replying to an attack. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
