Search for: "Justice v. Kennedy et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2015, 12:30 pm
Hodges [et al.], the US Supreme Court case that has brought equal marriage rights to same-sex couples in every state. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
Burd et al., 2017-0279. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
The new document (American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:04 pm
Justice Kennedy further explained that this ability for individuals to rely on the statistical evidence in their individual cases distinguished this case from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
University of Cincinnati Physicians, Inc., and Thomas John Kunkel, M.D., and West Chester Medical Center et al., 2016-0636. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:08 pm
But I see Madison et al. as having a different view. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
S. ___ (2013). [2] See Brief Of Amici Curiae Professors Gary King, et al, 2006 U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
Earth Island Institute, et al. (07-463). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:17 pm
Recently I wrote about the coercion question posed by Florida et al. in the PPACA litigation. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
The Justices thus looked in two clearly opposite directions as they heard more than 75 minutes of argument in American Electric Power, et al., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:41 pm
Navarro et al., holding that the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:06 am
The Court has released the opinion in Fitzgerald, et vir v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
Employees of a state or a political subdivision of a state may not be required to pay an agency-shop fee to a union unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay such a feeJanus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
The final two-parts will address Justice Stevens epic concurring opinion next week.Bilksi et al v Kappos (2010)Last Monday after weeks and months of waiting, the US Supreme Court issued their decision in Bilski ruling that business method patents were patentable, just not this one. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
” In Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department Of Corrections, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
Torres, et al. (06-766) was unanimous, although there were two concurring opinions. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:20 am
Gonzalez, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
Waldburger, et al., __ S. [read post]
