Search for: "Justice v. Mitchell"
Results 1 - 20
of 901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2023, 12:10 pm
Mitchell (Mitchell Law PLLC) has posted Why Was Roe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
In Mitchell v Wisconsin, 588 U. [read post]
Mitchell v. Wisconsin – Supreme Court Analyzes Exigency in the Context of an Unconscious DWI Suspect
5 Jul 2019, 3:43 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 8:30 pm
Mitchell (Solicitor General of Texas) has posted The Perils of Over-Constitutionalizing the Law: A Reply to Professor Epstein (University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Mitchell has posted Reconsidering Murdock: State-Law Reversals as Constitutional Avoidance (University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 3, Summer 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:58 am
The world changed when the Master of the Rolls said in Mitchell – “There now has to be a shift away from exclusively focussing on doing justice in the individual case”.There is a real risk that our civil courts are becoming more concerned about dates and forms than about Justice. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:58 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 10:49 am
Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case, Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:11 am
A few hours later I came across the report of CMEC v Mitchell on Bailii.The case involves the ever-ingenious David Burrows, who sought to claim that the Act applied to applications by CMEC under s.39A Child Support Act 1991 for the issue of a warrant committing the liable person to prison or for an order for him to be disqualified from holding or obtaining a driving licence. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
(While it's an interesting theory, we can't find it in the regulations.)For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Schorr v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 1:56 am
Hood & Sons v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:13 am
The recent case of The Police v Abdulle is telling. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:12 am
On examining the authorities relied upon in the Court of Appeal (R v Ngyuen [2008] EWCA Crim 585 and R v O’Dowd [2009] EWCA Crim 905), the Court did not consider that there was any clear definitive statement on the issue now raised. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:10 am
Justice Alito announced the judgment of the Court in Mitchell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
Last week, in Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 10:36 am
(Moyal v. [read post]
