Search for: "Justice v. Osborne" Results 1 - 20 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
Because so much is at stake in the case of District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
The problem with Osborne's case is that his facts look uncomfortably close to one where a defendant is trying to, as Justice Alito noted, game the system. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
A similar story can be told about Loving v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
Justice Sepulveda hints in this opinion that the answer is "Yes". [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:21 am
On March 2, 2009, in No. 08-6, District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
On Monday, March 3, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:03 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Switzer here: Skinner is seeking to raise an issue that the Justices had agreed to review last Term in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:13 pm
In a 5-4 decision delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held that "Osborne ha[d] no constitutional right to obtain postconviction access to the State's evidence for DNA testing. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 6:26 pm
John Osborne at Morgan & Finnegan argues for reversal in his article: "Justice Breyer's Bicycle and the Ignored Elephant of Patent Exhaustion: An Avoidable Collision in Quanta v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Jim Martin
The following is a guest post by Elizabeth Osborne, legal reference librarian. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Osborne (08-6), on the right to obtain DNA evidence. [read post]