Search for: "K E C O Industries, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 61 - 73
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Quincy, MA; Michael Foster, President) B&L Industries, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
It would also allow diplomats and Taiwanese military to display their flag and wear their uniforms while in the United States on official businesses. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
You'll supposedly be able to connect with some 800 leading professionals from the NYC real-estate industry including investors, developers, brokers, bankers, appraisers and the PropertyShark.com team. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
’: (IP finance), Allied Security Trust – High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright On distinguishing between creative commons, the public domain, and all rights reserved – confusion in mainstream media: (creativecommons.org), Inside views: a new business model for the music industry explained: (Intellectual Property Watch),… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC again affirms invalidation of claims to 'means'-defined elements involving a computer algorithm as indefinite: Net MoneyIN v Verisign (IP Updates) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) District Court: Patent term adjustments just got longer: Wyeth v Dudas… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Agard, Debtor, Chapter 7 The Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of New York The Judge: The Honorable Robert E. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
