Search for: "KENTUCKY v. HAMILTON" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Her aim was in part to engage Syria, as recommended by the Hamilton/Baker report, which does sound like the opposite of isolating Syria.) c) She was on a fact-finding mission. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
John Jay, the recipient of Hamilton’s letter, wrote of Virginia’s anti-assumption resolutions in his reply, ‘To treat them as very important might render them more so than I think they are. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Even Hamilton, sincerely or not, presented this by way of trying to assuage his opponents’ fears of the forthcoming constitutional order. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And these same rights would protect Lin-Manuel Miranda's casting choices for Hamilton. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Lash starts his compilation with the greatest hits of any conventional founding-era edited volume:   the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  (The Supreme Court, of course, paid absolutely no attention to Hamilton’s assurances in deciding in July that electors could actually be turned into mindless minions of whoever voted them into office, the one example at the national leve [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Well-known episodes such as the battle over Alexander Hamilton’s financial program, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, Marbury v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Kentucky, 384 U.S. 195 (1966) (holding that Kentucky's common law crime of criminal libel was unconstitutionally void, as no court case had redefined the crime's sweeping language in understandable terms, leaving prosecution decisions to be made on a case to case basis);  see also Tollett v. [read post]