Search for: "KERR v. ENGLAND" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2014, 4:15 am by Marian Ang, Olswang LLP
[3] Taylor (Bonnett) v The Queen [2013] UKPC 8, [2013] 1 WLR 1144 [4] Lundy v The Queen [2013] UKPC 8 [5] Expressed by the Supreme Court of New Zealand. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:47 am
Subscription service Lawtel picked this little post-franchising case up today: ChipsAway International Ltd v Errol Kerr [2008] EWHC 1887 (Ch) , a decision of the Chancery Division for England and Wales. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:51 am by Isobel Williams
Dame Sian Elias, the most senior lawyer in New Zealand, sits on the bench at Lord Kerr’s right hand. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 1:11 am by Peter Bert
When Hitler Stole Pink Rabbit, by Judith Kerr, Sir Michael’s sister, is the autobiographical story of the Kerr family’s emigration from Nazi Germany to Switzerland, France and eventually England. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Kerr argued that it was not a question of the law in Northern Ireland, but rather the law of England when the women were in England, and as such it did not impinge on the democratic decision of the Northern Ireland administration. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm by Orin Kerr
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 223, 225 (1769). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am by KIRSTEN SJØVOLL, MATRIX
Lord Kerr argued that it was not a question of the law in Northern Ireland, but rather the law of England when the women were in England. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:10 am by James Hand
At the end of July, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by Daniel West
The appeal was heard by a five justice panel of Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Reed. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Michaelmas Legal Term in England and Wales began a week ago, on Tuesday 1 October 2019. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Therefore, Lord Kerr would have found the scheme in England and Wales to fail the legality test since the cases show that there is at least the potential for widespread disproportionate outcomes in disclosure and so it cannot be said that there are safeguards adequately to examine proportionality. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am by Laura Sandwell
Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General for England and Wales, heard 9 – 11 October 2012. [read post]