Search for: "KIM v. GOOGLE, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had a piece “Google’s power is extraordinary’: businesses turn to the courts over bad reviews”. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In an important judgment in the case of Duffy v Google Inc  ([2015] SASC 170) Blue J in the South Australian Supreme Court found that Google is legally responsible when its search results link to defamatory content. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Now Paints Apple as ‘Ringmaster’ in Its Lawsuit on E-Book Price-Fixing http://t.co/fZGUryaJTg -> Google signs music service deals with Sony, Universal: report http://t.co/wzMbvmy0Vd -> Patent Troll Panel at Yale Law School http://t.co/zRfO4fZn16 -> The Alice in Wonderland En Banc Decision by the Federal Circuit in CLS Bank v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
EU On 7 April 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered his opinion in TU, RE v Google on the question of the specific function performed by search engines in relation to Articles 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which set out respectively the right to respect for private life, the right to protection of personal data, freedom of expression and information and freedom to conduct business. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Court https://t.co/zRQVGl35MM -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-12 http://t.co/XGQnOjMwcp -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-12: Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-05 http:… http://t.co/j8NFGdlDcX -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-13 http://t.co/wL1BZARZRV -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-13: Illegal downloaders get off scot free, as Copyright Tribunal pro… http://t.co/kGeEqDKuiN -> Lenz v… [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Google Inc., 2014 BCCA 448 http://t.co/lUYsm3ZxCf – decision is now on reserve -> Two Music Publishers Suing Cox Over Music Piracy http:/ [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board drew attention to a similar matter at issue in Warren Sign Company Inc v Piros Signs Inc (No 4) (1984),concerning the protection afforded to a technical drawing of a sign that was to be erected at Eagle Bank. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Apotex Inc patent case http://t.co/lYciQLVk9Z -> Pirate Bay Co-Founder Gottfrid Svartholm Found Guilty On Hacking, Vandalism Charges http://t.co/bASX6LcID6 -> Supreme Court holds patent infringement not "turpitude"/"illegality" for the purposes of the defence http://t.co/YZp48eLJgc -> Kim Dotcom’s battle for his MegaUpload assets moves to Hong Kong http://t.co/46slcKpSEC -> Dental procedure codes not protected by copyright Denturist Group of… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
It may not: Oracle won an important victory against Google when an U.S. appeals court decided Oracle could copyright parts of the Java programming language, which Google used to design its Android smartphone operating system - although use could still fall u [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/5cUgbQBWtB -> Netflix Says It’s ‘Killing’ BitTorrent Traffic http://t.co/VdhC2zWj9M -> Craigslist, Inc. v. 3Taps INC., Dist. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
Canada’s proposed legislation would force platforms like Google parent Alphabet Inc and Meta to negotiate commercial deals and pay Canadian news publishers for their content, part of a broader global trend to make tech firms pay for news. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]