Search for: "KIMBROUGH V DEFENSE"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2007, 5:07 pm
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:34 pm
US and Kimbrough v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:43 pm
In Kimbrough v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 3:09 am
The opinion looks back to a pre-Kimbrough case, United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:41 am
Sanchez-Gonzalez argues, however, that the Supreme Court's intervening decision in Kimbrough v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:49 pm
US and Kimbrough v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 2:38 am
Defense arguments trying to make use of Rita, Gall, and Kimbrough MUST be aggressive. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
In the development of the Supreme Court's post-Booker caselaw, culminating in Kimbrough, the Court has challenged the defense bar to put the Guidelines to the test. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Kimbrough v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court's decision in Kimbrough v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:41 pm
" Kimbrough, 128 S.Ct. 558, 563 (2007)(quoting Gall, 128 S.Ct. at 600). [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
" Kimbrough v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:03 am
Kimbrough’s green light to reject sentencing guidelines that are not the product of “empirical data and national experience,” has been a call to arms to defense lawyers and judges to subject individual guidelines, and their related commentary, to rigorous scrutiny. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:22 pm
Just when we might be resting on our Gall/Kimbrough/Regalado laurels, along comes United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:36 pm
Merritt (right) had nothing to do with the Ninth's Case o' The Week in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S., No. 07-10689 Sentence for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is reversed and the case remanded where the district court's statements during sentencing showed that it did not think it had the discretion, which was later upheld by the Supreme Court in Kimbrough v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 9:35 am
Kimbrough v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
