Search for: "KING et al v. UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:52 pm
See US Bank National Association, v Flatbush Extension LLC, et al., Index No. 26434/09. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global –… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
US courts generally decide such conflicts by weighing factors such as national interests, hardship of compliance, importance of the laws at hand, and good faith of the parties. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Solomon introduced a bill that eventually became the Solomon Amendment [8], mandating, in part, that military recruiters not be denied access to campuses lest the entire university be cut off from funding derived from the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, et al. [9],[10]. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
City of Agoura Hills (Doron Gelfand, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2020) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
That general rule, as the Appeals Chamber stated it, is based on “sovereign equality of States (par in parem non habet imperium). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
TAKINGS Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
The Employer and Petitioner are parties to a collective-bargaining agreement that covers a unit of service and maintenance employees, including the CNAs. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Howard E King, The lawyer for Thicke, WIlliams and co-writer rapper TI, said the decision set a "horrible precedent for music and creativity going forward". [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
(Chairman Battista and Members Schaumber and Kirsanow participated.) *** ELC Electric, Inc. (25-CA-28270-1, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 17) Indianapolis, IN Sept. 28, 2006. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
