Search for: "KING v. BARTON"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2016, 8:46 am
King Cty. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:46 am
King Cty. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:51 pm
Hrd-Benefits (Worker's Compensation) Barton v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:00 pm
Barton, and by three grandchildren. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 10:52 am
Bell[Affirmed; King; Sept. 5, 2014]Improper vehicle search [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:59 pm
Barton, and by three grandchildren. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Other coverage of and commentary on the Court focus on two of the Court’ highest-profile cases this Term: King v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:35 am
At E&E News, Pamela King covers last Thursday’s opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Oklahoma; Certificate of Appealability) In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015 (CERCLA; Natural Resource Damages) Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
Hrd-Benefits (Worker’s Compensation)Barton v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
” Jayesh Rathod has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in Barton v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:37 pm
Barton, 2007 U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:59 am
Barton, 988 So. 2d 82, 86 (Fla. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
Supreme Court case involving a statutory immigration provision has the potential for implications far beyond the narrow issue in the case”; she argues that “[t]he Supreme Court’s most recent statutory interpretation case, Barton v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Bell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The brief is on behalf of 27 intellectual property law and constitutional law professors: Jack Balkin (Yale Law School) Barton Beebe (NYU School of Law) Stacey L. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The case is proceeding before Mr Justice Bernard Barton and a jury. [read post]
