Search for: "KJ v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 9:52 am by immigrationprof
Julianne Hing on ColorLines looks at the possible impacts of a Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 7:43 am by immigrationprof
KJ Related articles Guest Blog Post: Scott Tishaw on United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:29 am by Immigration Prof
Download Fisher KJ Related articles On-Line Symposium on Supreme Court Decision in Kerry v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:00 am by Immigration Prof
University of Chicago Geoffrey Stone on the Huffington Post cogently analyzes in a balanced fashion the issues before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:56 am by Immigration Prof
Immigration attorney Ajla Glavasevic summarizes the issues in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm by Immigration Prof
Mehta & Partners PLLC Cyrus Mehta offers federal preemption as a potential basis for upholding President Obama's expanded deferred action program in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
Vervaele, Criminal Investigation and Prosecution by a European Public Prosecutor's Office in the EU John Hagan, Ron Levi, & Sara Dezalay, Prosecutorial Practice and Strategic Statements: Justifying International Prosecutions Victor Peskin, Virtual Trials Revisited: The Shifting Politics of State Cooperation from the UN Ad Hoc Tribunals to the International Criminal Court Anne Lise Kjær & Jakob v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
 This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm by LTA-Editor
One New York Times contributor, KJ Dell’Antonia, recently argued that states should do away with these exceptions. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix.
It declined to follow Mitting J in SS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/56/2009, 30 July 2010) that the observations in KJ were per incuriam. [read post]
24 Jan 2006, 2:38 am
The High Court in England seems to have made it far easier for a child-abducting parent to prove the defenses of consent and acquiescence in a Hague Convention child abduction case than has previously been the case.In CJ v KJ [2005] EWHC 2998 (Fam), Mr. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:42 am by Catriona Murdoch
(see KJ (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) The Court of Appeal was prepared to accept that KJ (Sri Lanka) was authority for the proposition that military action against the armed forces of the Government does not as such constitute terrorism or acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN (para 55 of the judgment). [read post]