Search for: "Kade v. State" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 5:36 pm by Aaron Barkoff
Kades noted that the increasing prevalence of such agreements since 2003, when the 6th Circuit declared a pay-for-delay settlement to be illegal in In re Cardizem, corresponds with the approval of such agreements by the 11th Circuit in 2005 (FTC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
  The Illinois Supreme Court held that the regulation was a tax, and not subject to takings analysis.The Mountain States Legal Foundation's brief argues the Court should review the case to resolve the confusion created by Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property, (in Relevance of… [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]