Search for: "Kansas Power and Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2012, 1:46 pm
In this partially mixed opinion, Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E), Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL), and Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Karen Dillon, Kansas City Star, May 7, 2010 A North Kansas City metal engraving company has agreed to pay $31,612 in penalties for failing to disclose the types of toxic chemicals that it used, federal officials said today. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
Energy Regulatory Comm'n, No. 04-1335, 05-1210, 05-1212 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's approval of rates charged by a Regional Transmission Organization that covered the cost of certain activities that may include lobbying did not violate the First Amendment rights of the member power utility companies who were forced to pay those costs. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Primaries in these states as well as Kansas and Washington kicked off a final series of intraparty contests before the midterms that will determine control of Congress in the fall. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
According to a consent agreement and final order filed today in Kansas City, Kan., several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) were noted during a February 2007 inspection of the UPS facility at 14650 West Santa Fe Trail Drive, in Lenexa. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
An agreement between the company and the EPA was filed Monday in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
” Specifically, DMWW asserts that the doctrines set forth by the defendants are no longer applicable in light of “modern understanding. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
This existing but undeveloped body of federal law helps shed light on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT& T v. [read post]
