Search for: "Kasowitz v. Kasowitz"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2021, 3:00 pm
No dice, said New York trial judge Andrew Borrok, in Walk v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:51 pm
Kasowitz Benson: Motion to Dismiss [Supreme Court of New York]Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Berry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:34 am
AC34179 - Kasowitz v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:15 pm
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v Duane Reade (2012 NY Slip Op 05889): The New York Appellate Division has held that 3 emails between a lawyer and a corporate client set forth a fee agreement between the two parties. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:19 am
BENSON KASOWITZ, ET AL Christopher R. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:41 pm
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:22 pm
Dueling Suits Between Firm, Ex-Partner Are Dismissed [New York Law Journal via Am Law Daily] Pitcock v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:54 am
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres LLP v Cabrera 2019 NY Slip Op 32738(U) September 13, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157367/2018 Judge: O. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:32 am
In a brisk and unequivocal grant of a CPLR 3211 motion, Justice Borrok makes some sweeping findings of fact in Walk v Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, 2022 NY Slip Op 50031(U) [74 Misc 3d 1203(A)], Decided on January 20, 2022, Supreme Court, New York. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:04 am
Walk v Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, 2022 NY Slip Op 50031(U) Decided on January 20, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Borrok, J. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:45 pm
Yet, rare or not, that is precisely the case in Berry v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:30 pm
., and Jonathan Waldrop of Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman, LLP will examine what's been happening at district courts since Berkheimer v HP Inc. and extract lessons for both plaintiffs and defendants. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
Ropes & Gray, or Daniel Alterman, counsel to Aaron Charney in Charney v. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 9:10 pm
Waldrop of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP; and Dr. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:52 am
Perhaps he ought to take another look at Clinton v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 1:40 pm
The lawsuit, Pitcock v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:19 am
Alvarez, Contempt, Coquina Investments, Coquina Investments v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In travel ban news, on Monday the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit announced its ruling upholding most of the injunction in Hawaii v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:44 am
Practice point: An exchange of e-mails may constitute an enforceable agreement if the writings include all of the agreement's essential terms, including the fee, or other cost, involved.Student note: The existence of the valid and enforceable fee agreement precludes the causes of action sounding in quasi contract.Case: Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
