Search for: "Kasper v. Kasper" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm by Geoff Schweller
NWC argues that Congress clearly intended for the de novo review of whistleblower award cases and that this standard was improperly stripped in the 2018 case Kasper v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm by Geoff Schweller
Despite Congressional intent for whistleblowers to receive de novo review, a 2018 ruling in Kasper v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The IPKat now hosted an analysis of the ruling by Kat friend Kasper Drazewski. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat is now pleased to host an analysis of the ruling by Kasper Drazewski (BEUC).Here's what Kasper writes:Go forth and reimplement your APIs: the April 5th Supreme Court judgment in Google v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:22 am
  The Danish Supreme Court was also busy making copyright waves when, on 18 December 2018, it delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Würtz v Coop (in Danish only). [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:41 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Jessenia Jiminez, No. 116,250 (Geary)State appeal (petition for review)Kasper C. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:50 pm by Jon
But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.Concurring, Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
All parties favoured the exploration of other solutions in addition to patent law.

 Amandine Métier (Véron & Associés), Thomas Misgaiski (HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER) and Vittorio Cerulli Irelli (Trevisan Cuonzo) had the pleasure of being joined by Judge Peter Blok of the Court of Appeal in The Hague to explore the CJEU's ruling on Huawei v ZTE, the national aftermath and the Judge's perspective. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:40 pm by Amy Howe
” At Wisconsin Appellate Law, Kellen Kasper discusses a recent Seventh Circuit decision striking down, in the wake of the Court’s recent decision in Reed v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:18 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Marrie, 43 M.J. 35 (C.A.A.F. 1995)); (5) whether the testimony in question is on a central or peripheral matter (Kasper, 58 M.J. at 314; United States v. [read post]