Search for: "Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics page, and we have added petitioners’ briefs to the case pages for Ransom v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Cases Every Lawyer Should Study.Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Kasten v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court directed that a complaint “must be sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it, in light of both content and context, as an assertion of rights protected by the statute and a call for their protection. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:00 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., which concluded that, for purposes of the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the phrase “filed any complaint” includes oral complaints. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp, the Court found that the anti-retaliation provision of FLSA which applies to people who “file” complaints applies even where the “filing” was purely a verbal complaint. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:57 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.). [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:38 am
From the majority’s perspective the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kasten v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. did not change things. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:38 am
Saint Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., though, was what kind of complaint qualified for protection under the Act, which referenced “fil[ing]” a complaint. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:53 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., a retaliation case in which cert. was granted on Monday, as well as a report on the Court’s rejection of Michigan’s plea for a preliminary emergency injunction to close Chicago locks. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Court held that for purposes of the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the term “filed any complaint” includes oral complaints in addition to written ones. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:47 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court recently held that an oral notice of a wage and hour claim to the employer qualified as a filing a claim for the purpose of an FLSA retaliation claim. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., a Fair Labor Standards Act case in which the business community had a clear interest, but in which the Chamber did not file a brief and the business community did not prevail.As I hope this post illustrates, the rush to characterize the Court as “pro” or “anti” business based on a handful of cases or even a single term inevitably results in sweeping conclusions that obscure more than they… [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
While the Seventh Circuit has not addressed the exact parameters of what constitutes a “complaint,” the Supreme Court stated in Kasten v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp, that a complaint must give the employer fair notice that a grievance has been lodged against it. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:46 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., No. 09-834 (argued October 15, 2010), also implicates a retaliation issue – whether the FLSA protects employees from retaliation for complaining orally about violations of the statute or whether the complaints must be in writing. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:21 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., which held that oral complaints are covered under the FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision, the High Court expressly declined to resolve the separate question of whether “complaints made directly to an employer” (be they oral or written) fall within the statute’s scope—or if instead the statute protects only “formal complaints made to an administrative or governmental authority. [read post]
