Search for: "Katebi v Fink"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
Bannon is yet another case in the Katebi v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:08 am
The first is that such a case can survive the post-Katebi v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
"Moreover, as to all defendants, the evidence establishes that when entering into the settlement of the divorce action, plaintiff acknowledged in open court that she was satisfied with counsels' representation, and that she entered into the settlement agreement with the knowledge that her husband's real estate partnership investments had not yet been valued "(see Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424 [2008]). [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:45 am
In Harvey v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
Under these circumstances, the motion court properly dismissed the complaint (see Weissman v Kessler, 78 AD3d 465 [2010]; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424 [2008]). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:39 am
This concept was first enunciated in the First Department in Katebi v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 3:50 am
Fink, 51A.D.3d424, 425 [l st Dept. 2008] (granting motion to dismiss); But see Cruciata v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:54 am
(Katebi v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am
[*3]Since the remaining allegations in the complaint were flatly refuted by the defendant’s documentary evidence, we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination to grant the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757-758; Weissman v Kessler, 78 AD3d 465, 466; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424, 425; Pacella v Whiteman… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
Aronson, Mayesfsky & Sloan, LLP, 168 AD3d 70, 75-76 [1st Dept 2018]; Harvey v Greenberg, 82 AD3d 683, 683 [1st Dept 2011]; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424, 425 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
