Search for: "Kats v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2019, 11:40 am
First up, a look at the case ofJohnson v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 6:24 am
Details and registration is available here.One Kat experiencing a bout of exhaustionFinally, the Intellectual Property Lawyers Organisation is hosting a dinner on 11 June at Gray’s Inn on Copyright v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
” The rapper revealed he plans to sue for 8 to 10 million dollars, which  might seem extreme for some but falls within the average damages compensation for infringing a celebrity’s publicity right in the USA. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 1:03 am
  David Brophy posted his Katpost on Wilko v Buyology (a recent ruling on whether and, if so, when a trade mark owner can be refused an order that the defendant disclose details of the supplier of infringing goods), so quickly that new guest Kat Rebecca -- who had just written on the same decision -- was literally pipped at the post. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
These musings have been sparked off by the timely appearance (is it coincidence or cunning, the Kat wonders?) [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 2:58 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
Reviewing a book such as the CIPA Guide to the Patents Act is a dream for a patent nerd like this Kat. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
The Kats will all be watching to see how this action will proceed. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
The Kats welcome Wolfe. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:11 am
 Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 467. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
As reported previously on this weblog, in 2012 the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body decided in favour of Mexico in the long-standing Mexico v USA dolphin-safe labelling dispute. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
 With this background, consider the following decision of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (BC) in  Equustek Solutions Inc. v Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, released on 15 June 2015. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:57 pm
In this context the word 'London' in RUL's name was important because it did rather suggest that RUL, unlike Regent, was not a university based in the USA. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
The USA has always been quite forward in this respect. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
However, if the applicant responds to the PTO immediately after receiving the search report by informing the PTO that he wishes the mark to be registered irrespective of the content of the search report the mark will usually be accepted for registration within weeks instead of awaiting the deadline.If the applicant responds immediately to the search report a national Danish trade mark application is currently processed within 3-4 months".A pretty hopeless appeal against refusal to grant a… [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
Boldface Licensing & Branding Inc., USA involving the Kardashian sisters.A Kat that is interested in the three stripes  PatentKluwer Patent Blog also had a number of posts this week. [read post]