Search for: "Katz v. Securities and Exchange Commission" Results 101 - 111 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Thompson (Georgetown University), on Thursday, April 5, 2018 Tags: Corporate liability, Exchange Act, Liability standards, Misreporting, Rule 10b-5, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts The Maturing Market for Representation and Warranty Insurance Posted by Ian Boczko and John L. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Executive Compensation, Long-Term value, Repurchases, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Taxation Marking to Market Versus Taking to Market Posted by Guillaume Plantin (Sciences Po) and Jean Tirole (University of Toulouse & IAST) , on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Contracts, Fair… [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Notably, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has not mandated identical universal proxy cards. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Notably, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has not mandated identical universal proxy cards. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Channel 4 has announced that it has commissioned a Docu-drama of the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper has provided a summary of the 5 things you need to know about the EU Commission’s draft Regulation on the European Health Data Space. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]