Search for: "Kaufman v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Claim handlers continue to wrestle with enduring long-tail Exchange Act claims, federal and state Securities Act claims, and shareholder derivative suits without respite. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:33 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Recently, the United States Supreme Court, the Nation’s highest Court, resolved a reported $8 billion dispute in favor of tech conglomerate Google over its competitor Oracle. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 5:00 pm by Jacqueline L. Bonneau, Alvin Li
  Furthermore, the Court noted “that any dispute arising under and concerning the interpretation and enforcement of the Stipulation shall be resolved in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:20 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Manuel Chavez, addressed the applicability of anti-SLAPP to federal law claims, specifically §1983 of title 42 of the United States Code. [read post]
The Court then cited to examples: adoption of LAFCo policies permitting development outside of cities was a project (Id.) whereas the formation of a Mello-Roos district for the purposes of new school facilities was not a project as the causal connection was missing (Kaufman & Broad-South Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
The Court then cited to examples: adoption of LAFCo policies permitting development outside of cities was a project (Id.) whereas the formation of a Mello-Roos district for the purposes of new school facilities was not a project as the causal connection was missing (Kaufman & Broad-South Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]