Search for: "Kay v. Smith*"
Results 21 - 40
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Unlike Kay v Lambeth and Connors, both Smith v Evans and the present case involved proceedings brought after s.211 of the Housing Act 2004 came into effect, amending s.4 Caravan Sites Act 1968 to remove the exemption of local authorities from the court’s power to suspend execution of a possession order,. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am
STP Corp., 170 F.3d 1043, 1044 (11th Cir. 1999); Kay v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am
STP Corp., 170 F.3d 1043, 1044 (11th Cir. 1999); Kay v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
OpinionShort Title/District 07a0433p.06 Morgan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm
Rather unusually, faced with one of the most coruscating High Court judgments I can recall, in AA V LB Southwark [our report here], the senior officers of Southwark Council have chosen to do neither. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
In 1993, this practice led to the Utah Supreme Court ruling in East Jordan Irrigation Company v Morgan, commonly known as "the East Jordan Case." [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 11:46 am
Kai, Inc., 2017 WL 5195203, at *2 (D. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:56 am
It is therefore with some interest that this particular Kat read the Court of Appeal’s judgment in JIH v News Group Newspapers [2011] EWCA Civ 42 (the Master of the Rolls providing a judgment with which Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Lady Justice Smith agreed), handed down yesterday. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:40 pm
” Kate Smith of CBS News reports that “Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They go on to quote extensively from Lord Bingham in Kay because there's not much difference between him and the majority in Kay, the need for highly exceptional circumstances even on his braoder formulation, and his judgment was approved by the ECHR in McCann. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They go on to quote extensively from Lord Bingham in Kay because there's not much difference between him and the majority in Kay, the need for highly exceptional circumstances even on his braoder formulation, and his judgment was approved by the ECHR in McCann. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
Conference on RPM - On December 4, a conference was held in Washington, D.C. on the topic of resale price maintenance ("RPM") by consumer advocates, regulators, and policy experts opposed to RPM.Minimum RPM has emerged as a hot topic in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2007 ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm
It’s a bad thing to do drugs, so don’t be bad by doing drugs, m’kay, that’d be bad. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
