Search for: "Kearse v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
They lack standing to sue.The case is Citizens United to Protect our Neighborhoods v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:18 am
But the Second Circuit has also said, notably in Henry v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:23 am
The appeal is dismissed and resolution of this case will be delayed.The case is Zivkovic v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:08 am
"The case is Porter v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:31 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:40 am
This state-of-mind test applies in other Circuits, and now it applies in the Second Circuit. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
The case is Khan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:28 am
But he may not.The case is Vincent v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 6:08 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
On December 29, 2022, the Second Circuit issued its highly anticipated opinion on remand in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 10:55 am
Win some, lose some.The case is Schwartz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:46 am
In dismissing this claim, the district court stated that "[a]lthough the Second Circuit has not ruled on whether a private right of action exists under Title IX for claims of employment discrimination, '[a]n overwhelming majority of district courts in this Circuit have found that an implied private right of action does not exist[] under Title IX for employees alleging gender discrimination in the terms and conditions of their employment.'" The Court of Appeals… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:04 am
From Vengalattore v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:15 am
A companion case, Lin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
See Craig v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:07 am
The State of Connecticut in 2012 overhauled its policies guiding when inmates can possess sexually-explicit materials. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]