Search for: "Keene v. Keene"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 10:13 am
Last summer, the need to further turn our attention to the states was thrown into sharp relief following the Supreme Court’s egregious decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:05 pm
Daniel Harawa (Washington University School of Law) has posted NYSRPA V. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Or if the “places of worship” are not keen on engaging with their local council? [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:39 am
The keen reader will note that my articles ONLY cite Illinois state case law when possible. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
Those changes met Court approval in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v Chevron Corp., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:01 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —A year ago, we blogged about a proposed rule that would replace the Quality System Regulation (QSR) at 21 C.F.R. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
As discussed by one 2013 New York state trial court decision, Lawsuit Funding, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
(For more on this, see Chambers v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
The Ninth Circuit has been similarly slow; two opinions on Monday and two today, but nothing at all on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.Unless you're a trademark scholar with a keen Article III focus, I doubt that today's opinion will especially wet your whistle. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
He cited the cases of South Cambridgeshire District Council v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Mr Kaye was understandably keen to enforce the £500,000 or so debt. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Henderson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:33 pm
First, in Pereira v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
” The status of the morning after pill has been a key issue since the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:36 pm
The government isn't keen on that idea, but defendant is psyched for it, and the trial judge (Judge Du, in Nevada) thinks it's the best option. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Tjaden’s dual role as lawyer and law librarian has given him keen insight into the systematic categorization of information in such a way as to simplify the navigation by his target audience. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
From Gannett Media Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
Because mesothelioma is sometimes considered, uncritically, as pathognomonic of amphibole asbestos exposure, Moline was obviously keen to establish the absence of occupational exposure in any of the 33 cases. [read post]
