Search for: "Keita v. Keita" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2021, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the defendants seek appellate review of the Supreme Court’s determination of damages after an inquest, they failed to include the relevant papers and transcripts to enable meaningful appellate review of that issue (see CPLR 5526; Rubio-Modica v Modica, 100 AD3d 979; Keita v United Parcel Serv., 65 AD3d 571, 572). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am by Blake Van Santen
” Note: Readers may be interested in our South Africa v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
(Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council )The United Nations Human Rights Council has a number of interests. [read post]