Search for: "Kelley v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2022, 8:08 am by Scott Riddle
  The case came to the Georgia Supreme Court after the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia certified the question to the Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:31 pm
(Full Board participated.) *** United States Postal Service (9-CA-42466; 347 NLRB No. 89) Columbus, OH Aug. 11, 2006. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:45 pm
The United States's amicus brief is available here. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-5454. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am by Michael Risch
Kelley is correctly decided as a causation matter. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Akamai) – Washington, DC attorney David Long of Kelley Drye on the firm’s Essential Patent Blog Minority Shareholder? [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:32 pm by Michael Froomkin
The article includes a link to Attorney General Eric Holder’s declaration in Ibrahim v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 12:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
§ 271(a), which requires the acts of infringement to take place within the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-1503, and Overton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 12:52 pm
§ 285Enforceable Patent Rights to Research Institutions and their Exclusive LicenseesAppeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in Nos. 3:13-cv-00651-JLS- MDD, 3:13-cv-00830-JLS-MDD, 3:13-cv-01015-JLS-MDD, Judge Janis L. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]