Search for: "Kelly S. Lucas v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
Second, contrary to the State’s argument, the Supreme Court of Ohio recognized in State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:03 am
The plaintiffs argue the seat’s restraint system strangled Lucas Ribeiro which caused him to suffer brain damage. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:03 am
The plaintiffs argue the seat’s restraint system strangled Lucas Ribeiro which caused him to suffer brain damage. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
Lucas, 2022-NCCOA-714, ___ N.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:52 pm
" Lucas v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The Privacy Perspective Blog has a piece on Fairhurst v Woodard G00MK161, the neighbourhood dispute that found CCTV camera’s and a Ring doorbell to amount to a breach of the Data Protection Act 2018, nuisance and harassment. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Ninth Circuit overturned the district court’s ruling holding instead that the state court requirement was overturned in the Knick v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
In addition to this, all state public defender cases are included. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Berris, Marc S. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
