Search for: "Kelly v. State Personnel Board" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:06 am
Citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Appellate Division, noting that the volunteer’s acts of misconduct might not, individually, warrant expulsion from the Fire Department, said that “considering his conduct as a whole, we do not find the penalty of expulsion to be so disproportionate to the disciplinary charges as to be shocking to our sense of fairness. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
The article is an offshoot of a speech Steve recently gave for JP Morgan (Hong Kong) and it is entitled "Danone v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]