Search for: "Kelo v. City of New London"
Results 61 - 80
of 589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
City of New London (2005) McCreary County, Kentucky v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:08 am
Supreme Court decided Kelo v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:18 pm
City of New London (2005), which—although egregious in other respects—still noted that the "pretextual" use of eminent domain for the purpose of benefiting a private party is unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:20 pm
City of New London, were among the most problematic Supreme Court decisions of the last several decades. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm
And in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
City of New London (and also Berman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 11:55 am
City of New London (2005). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 8:34 pm
As a result, the New London Development Corporation—a private entity authorized by the City of New London—was able to condemn fifteen residential properties in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood of New London. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
City of New London. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:04 pm
City of New London. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
City of New London, major changes occurred in the legal world when it came to eminent domain actions. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
City of New London both indicate that the “for public use” portion of the Takings Clause restricts condemnations further than normal due process limits on state police power. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 9:51 am
City of New London, which ruled that private economic development projects are a permissible "public use," there has been a longstanding debate over exactly what qualifies as a public use under federal and state constitutions. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 3:07 pm
City of New London that the government could condemn homes to promote private "economic development. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 12:13 pm
City of New London, the dubious 2005 decision in which the Supreme Court ruled that the government can take private property and transfer it to another private party in order to promote "economic development. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 7:25 am
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:04 pm
In its controversial 2005 ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
City of New London, this also serves a public purpose. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In Kelo v. [read post]
