Search for: "Kendall v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:45 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
” The United States Supreme Court first held that the Fourteenth Amendment applied to jury selection in in 1880 in Strauder v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:53 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note -- Sorry for the delay; Jon and I were both out late last week.]United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:08 pm
Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre Klaus Ferdinand Gärditz, “Treaty Override” Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawK.J. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, invalidating the federal corruption convictions of former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:51 am
United States, No. 14-29, and the statement respecting the denial of certiorari that Justice Antonin Scalia issued, in which Justice Clarence Thomas joined, at this link. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:27 pm by Paul Levy
District Judge Virginia Kendall, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, decided that Forte was protected from suit by 47 U.S.C. § 230 and that re-labeling its defamation claims as trademark claims (or right of publicity claims, or misappropriation claims) was not enough to evade section 230.  [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving threats made on social media. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm by Molly Runkle
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 6:54 am by Cormac Early
United States, in which it considered whether appellate courts reviewing for plain error in criminal cases should consider the state of the law at the time of appeal or at the time of trial.   [read post]