Search for: "Kenly v. Ukegawa (1993)" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Cupps v. Mendelson: Trial Court Properly Vacated $160,000 Punitive Damages Award Because Plaintiff Failed to Prove Defendant's Financial Condition
9 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Court of Appeal noted that it had previously rejected that reasoning in Kenly v. [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
XTC Investments, LLC v. Bluenose Trading, Inc.: California Court of Appeal affirms $318,551 punitive damages award (1:1 ratio) for financial tort
3 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lisa Perrochet
Ukegawa (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 49, 58 [“Without evidence of the actual total financial status of the defendants, it is impossible to say that any specific award of punitive damages is appropriate"]; see Adams v. [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/