Search for: "Kennedy v. Hughes" Results 1 - 20 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am by Sherry Colb
Colb is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 10:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Congratulations also to my UCLA colleague Richard Re, whose amicus brief was discussed by four Justices (Alito, Ginsburg, Kennedy, and Sotomayor) at oral argument last week in Hughes v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 12:54 pm
As with the debate with Republicans over the Z Visa/path to citizenship of McCain-Kennedy, the Arizona senator is running into the political reality of his... [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am by Dan Ernst
[HNN, which carried my post on Charles Evans Hughes when it originally appeared back in April, offered to send it out again if I added a introduction in light of the NFIB v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm by Mark Bennett
Rick Casey thinks we Texas criminal defense lawyers are “coddled” (Paul Kennedy) because the Texas Supreme Court declared in 1995 in Peeler v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Austria (application no. 39534/07 and my case comment), the majority of the UK Supreme Court rejected the argument that there was such an Article 10 right (see Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20). [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am by Paul Horwitz
Like most people, I expect, my first thoughts on reading Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the Court in Town of Greece v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Mark Tushnet briefly blogs on The Hughes Court on the Cambridge University Press blog. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Kent Scheidegger
  There are two sentencing cases and a follow-up to a capital case from five years ago.Justice Kennedy takes the Understatement of the Day Award in Hughes v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
And petitioner’s proposed “unpredictability test”—that a judicial taking consists of a decision that “constitutes a sudden change in state law, unpredictable in terms of relevant precedents,” Hughes v. [read post]