Search for: "Kennedy v. Client Services Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2020, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A release may not be read to cover matters which the parties did not desire or intend to dispose of'” (Wechsler v Diamond Sugar Co., Inc., 29 AD3d 681, 682, quoting Lefrak SBN Assoc. v Kennedy Galleries, 203 AD2d 256, 257; see Demaria v Brenhouse, 277 AD2d 344). [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:31 pm
General Motors Corp., 373 U.S. 734 (1963), and Communications Workers v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
In determining whether the presumption should be applied, he found that the public utility presumption has been applied only to traditional public utilities such as electricity, natural gas, telephone, and cable television services, where the employers provide an essential service directly to the public and are the only providers of that service. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
Hartson-Kennedy Cabinet Top Co., Inc., a 12-page opinion, Judge Najam writes:United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G") appeals from the trial court's order granting the petition of Hartson-Kennedy Cabinet Top Company, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 8:42 am by MBettman
Case Background Tamara Friebel provided in-home health care services to clients of Visiting Nurse Association of Mid-Ohio (VNA). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
"   At the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro recaps the oral argument in Mohawk Industries Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., and Wheaton College v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]