Search for: "Kennedy v. Hughes"
Results 61 - 80
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2021, 8:14 am
Hughes, Okl., 363 P.2d 155 (1961); (10) the wife's health, Henley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm
Safiret relied upon the test set out by the concurring opinion of Justice Stewart in Hughes v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
This includes a cite in Koons to the decision in Hughes v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
(“I thought you would prefer to make history than to write it,” Kennedy told him, miffed.[15]) But Freund himself was unable to complete his own assignment, a volume on the Hughes Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:40 pm
Lastly, Siobhan Hughes reports here (subscription req'd) in the Wall Street Journal that the Justice Department refrained from filing an amicus brief in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:18 pm
I thought for years that the Supreme Court reversing Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that the dispute in Hughes v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
Kennedy v Charity Commission [2012] EWCA Civ 317 (20 March 2012). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Kennedy again appears to be the swing vote in a divided court. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:34 am
On Friday, the Justices said they would accept Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
(Murray v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Erica Goldberg writes that in Hughes v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp and Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
Hugh Stephens, in an INFORRM post, has highlighted the questions of whether and how platforms can be how hold accountable for the content they host. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm
Nor is there any argument that the current Court might not follow Truax; Justice Kennedy cited it with approval three years ago in the substantively similar decision in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
Canada The Hugh Stephens Blog has a post entitled FairPlay Canada, the CRTC and OpenMedia: Who Got the “Big Win” on Pirate Site-Blocking? [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
Then in 2010 Roberts sided with another conservative majority, this time helmed by Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the Citizens United v. [read post]
