Search for: "Kennedy v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 4:48 am
On July 9, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Irene Danopulos v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 9:42 am
Laurence Joachim et al. and Leon Isaac Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
A "writ of prohibition", in the United States, is an official legal document drafted and issued by a supreme court, superior court or an appeals court to a judge presiding over a suit in an inferior court. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:22 am
Citgo was superior to the Ninth Circuit’s approach, and Boutrous agreed. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
I complained back when the Supreme Court’s Perdue v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
So Justice Kennedy [the key swing voter on the Court] might now decide that race-based affirmative action is unconstitutional whenever race-neutral policies, like the 10 percent plan, alone can further diversity….. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:50 am
The judge hearing the case at that time, then-Superior Court Judge Barbara J. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:52 pm
I have dealt with competency issues in DC Federal and DC Superior Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
P. v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
Kennedy issued an executive and provided financing for it. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:13 am
The best hope for the government came from Justice Kennedy’s suggestion that the Court could reverse the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of the contracts at issue in this case, holding that Stanford’s contract was superior to Roche’s. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Congress had challenged the bill as being unconstitutional on the grounds that it encroached upon their superior powers to enforce federal immigration laws. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1986) 182 CA3d 431 The ability to issue sanctions for non-compliance of the CMO. [read post]
