Search for: "Kennedy v. The United States Courts et al" Results 1 - 20 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
Canada (Attorney General) and National Football League, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm by Giesela Ruehl
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA… [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Not only should the First Amendment apply to the publication by Assange of Manning leaks – after all such publication was not dissimilar from that of the New York Times, the Guardian, et. al. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 2:16 pm by Tatiana Venn
Lamberth granted significant new discovery to us on the Clinton email issue (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
He cited subsequent cases that have construed Kiyemba narrowly: Aamer, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Following Recent Cases in Media Law at the European Court of Human Rights, van der Hof et al. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
On 25 and 26 July 2018, the Court of Appeal (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
Kentucky, the Supreme Court ruled that failure of a defense attorney to inform a client that a collateral consequence of their felony plea could lead to the client’s (in this case, a forty-year permanent resident in the United States) deportation constituted deficient performance by the attorney.[8] Two years later, in Missouri v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:20 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Holder (Susan SEVEN–SKY, Also Known as Susan Sevensky, et al., Appellants v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The majority sent a strong anti-choice signal, which is likely to become even stronger with the addition of a new justice to the United States Supreme Court.The PrequelsIn 1992, it was possible that the Court would overrule Roe v. [read post]