Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 361 - 380
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
In Brief: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that, apparently for the first time, the record in a case consists only of a single DVD; the case is Wetzel v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports that Justice Scalia denied a stay application submitted by Texas death row inmate Carroll Joe Parr. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger links to a report in the San Jose Mercury-News (which Cormac covered in yesterday’s round-up) on California’s filing of a notice of appeal indicating that it will ask the Court to review an order requiring California to decrease its prison population. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:28 am
Kent Scheidegger's interpretation, here, of the Baze opinion is consistent with the sweeping view of the case that pro-death penalty advocates will no doubt seek to promote. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am
I covered the stay for this blog, while Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” Kent Scheidegger comments on the order at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:21 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger welcomes the prospect of free public access to filings, noting that “[i]n the lower federal courts, public documents are available only by payment of a fee that has little relation to the cost of providing the service. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:13 am
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Court’s denial of relief to a Georgia death row inmate, who was executed on Friday; only Justice Stephen Breyer dissented from the Court’s order. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 7:11 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger defends Florida judge Barbara Lagoa, another prominent candidate for Ginsburg’s seat, against criticism for Lagoa’s decision not to recuse herself “from a case involving Florida’s felon re-enfranchising law” earlier this year. [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:29 pm
Kent Scheidegger’s notes that it is unclear whether Graham threatens any of the six sentences. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences has this post on the Brendlin decision and two cert. denials in capital cases; at Sentencing Law & Policy, Doug Berman weighs in here on today's action. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has an update on Ryan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
Over at Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis will happily expound on why Spisak should be killed and the legal standards are way too generous to the criminally accused, convicted, and sentenced. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:11 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences calls the decision “unsurprising. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences blog has posted a review of the last term’s criminal law rulings, concluding that “it could have been worse. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who discusses the timing for a successor at PrawfsBlawg; from Kent Scheidegger, who criticizes the record of Judge Jane Kelly in capital cases at Crime and Consequences; and in an op-ed for USA Today, where Eric Wang argues that, although we “may not know for sure exactly what Scalia would have thought about the merits of the arguments now being made about who should appoint his successor,” “we do know what he would have… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
” Kent Scheidegger’s comments for Crime & Consequences can be accessed here. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:23 pm
"This is a dramatic reaffirmation of what we've already known for some time, that capital punishment in California takes way too long," Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the law-and-order Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, said of Johnson's bet that he will live a long life on death row. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:39 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses (and pushes back against) a recent article by Adam Liptak on summary dispositions at the Court this Term. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
Chatman, holding by a vote of seven to one that the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision that the defendant failed to show purposeful race discrimination in the selection of his jury was clearly erroneous, comes from Tony Mauro of Supreme Court Brief (subscription or registration required); commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Janell Ross for The Washington Post, Steven Mazie in The Economist, and Garrett Epps in The Atlantic. [read post]
