Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 421 - 440
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 6:56 am
" Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which supports the death penalty, said problems with veins were inevitable in lethal injection by IV. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
Amy Howe has posted details on the opinion here; other coverage comes from Kent Scheidegger at C&C Blog and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:18 am
” (& Althouse, Leef/Phi Beta Cons, Horwitz, Instapundit, State Bar of Michigan, Elie Mystal/Above the Law, Kent Scheidegger/Crime and Consequences, Andrew Kloster/FIRE and earlier, Federalist Society blog, earlier) [Original post:] “A woman who alleges she was denied a job at the University of Iowa College of Law because of her conservative politics can proceed with a discrimination lawsuit against the school’s former dean, a federal appeals court ruled [last… [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Burwell, comes from Noah Feldman in his column for Bloomberg View, Kent Scheidegger for Crime and Consequences, Mark Miller at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Todd Haugh in a podcast for the Northwestern University Law Review’s online edition, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog (Hasen also had a shorter post earlier in the day), Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Brianne Gorod at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, and the blog… [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger anticipates the Court’s decision in Elonis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
The Court did not offer an explanation for its action, but at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his “best guess,” which Orin Kerr (at the Volokh Conspiracy) considers a “pretty good guess. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Defending juvenile LWOP sentences, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences responds that Simpson confuses intentional crime with the more common recklessness of youth. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
Kent Scheidegger reports at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the court yesterday sent a case back to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to determine whether a military statute of limitations barred a 2014 prosecution for a rape that occurred in 2005. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the other summary reversal, in Kernan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
If the case doesn't go en banc at the Ninth Circuit, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences says it will be a "slam-dunk for Supreme Court review. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” Another take on Moore comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who argues that Bobby Moore’s lawyers engaged in a “bait-and-switch” at “the nation’s highest court” by changing the basis on which they were challenging the Texas standard for intellectual disability. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
Arizona comes from Kent Scheidegger, who at Crime and Consequences offers “a simple proposal for a modernization of Miranda”; and from Samuel Gross and Maurice Possley, who at The Marshall Project suggest that electronic recording of interrogations “should be universal. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the Supreme Court has adopted this year’s set of amendments to the federal rules of procedure. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
Calling the opinion "cryptic," Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences suggests that "a practical solution is for the judge to pass on the other issues when he knows the decision is clear but go ahead and rule on them when he knows the decision is in a gray zone where other judges may differ. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
Rizo comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his “initial impressions” of the oral argument, and concludes that “[w]ith this many splits among the Justices, there is no predicting the outcome. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
JURIST also has coverage, while at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger noted that the case clarifies the Court’s 2007 ruling in Burton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:13 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reacts to the latter editorial, expressing surprise that “we would read the words ‘Donald Trump is right’ in a New York Times editorial about anything, but especially about one of the Left’s favorite jurists. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
Legal Director Kent S. [read post]
