Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 541 - 560
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reviews the committee report on the statute at issue in the case. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:00 pm
”Such plea bargains play an important role in the prosecution of death cases.As Kent Scheidegger wrote in 2009, “More defendants plea bargain to a life or long sentence in states where the death penalty is available. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” Commentary on the appointment comes from Christina Cauterucci at Slate’s XX Factor blog, who looks at what Gorsuch’s nomination means for women, arguing that as “far as the health, safety, and civil rights of America’s women are concerned, it’s hard to imagine how the court could do worse”; Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, who maintains that “Donald Trump has managed to pick a nominee who should please everyone other… [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
” Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences denounces the advantage that may be gained in the nomination process by judges with former law clerks in politics, as described Tuesday by Jess Bravin in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
In the New York Times Adam Liptak reports on Professor Richard Fallon’s decision not to sign an amicus brief urging a federal court to uphold the health care law as an illustration of broader issues relating to academic amicus briefs, which prompted this anecdote from Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger calls the decision “a win for cops and for looking at evidence as a wall and not a collection of bricks. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses last week’s renaming of George Mason University’s law school as the Antonin Scalia Law School, stating that “Justice Scalia was a giant of the law and a leader in producing an important change in direction for our judicial system. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
UPI describes the ruling, and Kent Scheidegger offers his analysis at the Crime and Consequences blog. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks that Friday’s order denying the federal government’s request to move forward immediately with federal executions “may have been a Pyrrhic victory,” because several justices signaled their “impatience” at the prospect of delay in the case; the court of appeals yesterday set an expedited briefing schedule, with oral argument on January 15. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Although most coverage of the two cases focused on the Court’s treatment of the Ninth Circuit, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences looks at the broader picture, describing Harrington as “a landmark decision in the law of federal habeas corpus. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
” Kent Scheidegger discusses all yesterday’s grants at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks on the lack of criminal law action in Monday’s Supreme Court opinions and orders. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the per curiam disposition of Williams v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:35 pm
" As Kent Scheidegger noted in his comments to Lyle's earlier post, Rule 37.6 has been revised to require that a merits amicus brief be filed "within 7 days after the brief for the party supported is filed, or if in support of neither party, within 7 days after the time allowed for filing the petitioner's or appellant's brief. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
"Choking off the appeals is part of the strategy" of those opposed to capital punishment, Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, says of what he calls unnecessarily elaborate state court requirements for taking on death penalty cases. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
” Kent Scheidegger remarks on yesterday’s denials at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Woods v. [read post]
