Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 581 - 600 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 3:33 am by SHG
Crime & Consequences, to see what sort of lunacy Bill and his partner in crime, Kent Scheidegger, had cooking. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from William Marshall at ACS Blog, Mark Kende at ACS Blog, Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Allen Ides in The Sacramento Bee, Amy Vitale in an op-ed at The Hill, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times, Stephen Henderson in the Detroit Free Press, William Astore in The Huffington Post, Tony May in an op-ed for Penn Live, Philip Martin in an op-ed at ArkansasOnline, Paul Rosenberg at… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger concludes that “the Supreme Court majority and the Eleventh Circuit have correctly interpreted the statute,” and that although “[t]here is surely much room for policy disagreement in this area, … those arguments should be made to Congress. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 2:09 am
"For Kent Scheidegger, legal director of California's Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, the answer for Floridians is simple:"Justice is sometimes carried out," he said. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
Berman suggests that the Court’s resolution of the case “is designed to try to ensure that the ruling ends up not being especially consequential,” while at the blog Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger has two posts (here and here) weighing in on the implications of the “narrow” decision. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Lisa Soronen at the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Jim Harper at Cato at Liberty. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:18 am by Jeff Gamso
  Kent Scheidegger, over at Crime & Consequences, thinks it only fair that my clients should be killed. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
Jonathan Adler at the Volokh Conspiracy, Ed Whelan at Bench Memos, and Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences all take note of Hurley’s story and the overrepresentation of the Ninth Circuit on the Supreme Court’s docket. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the pro-death penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation immediately fretted that any moratorium, de facto or otherwise, would dilute deterrence and "cause more innocent people to die".It is, of course, beyond the realms of ridiculous to think that criminals who have until now been reining in their murderous impulses, will have read the court's ruling and, with a sigh of relief, decided they can now go on killing sprees. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the four criminal cases among the new grants. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the case comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, here and here. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the decision was a “stern rebuke” to the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences Blog criticizes the article for “exaggerat[ing] the extent of the changes…. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
”  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger agrees with the Court that “[t]he asserted justifications for searching the phone immediately without a warrant are weak,” but he adds that “[t]he Fourth Amendment should not be a ground for excluding evidence from a criminal trial unless the police acted in bad faith. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:25 am by Adam Chandler
Because of that voting pattern, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences observes, Justice Kennedy’s concurrence (joined by Justice Thomas) “should have a bit more clout than most concurrences, as Justices Kennedy and Thomas are necessary votes for the majority. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:11 am by Steve Hall
The number of new death sentences fell dramatically last year and for the last decade have been well below the rate of the 1990s, said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Kent Scheidegger looks at yesterday’s sentencing decisions, along with a cert denial in a capital case, at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am by Steve Hall
"This is a huge part of the explanation for why we're seeing fewer death sentences," said Kent Scheidegger, a death-penalty supporter and legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, Calif. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Kent Scheidegger discusses the ruling at Crime and Consequences. [read post]