Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am
Kerr-McGee, 291 Fed.App’x 626 (2008) (in which our firm represented the royalty owners). [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:36 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court handed down a new decision today, State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:05 am
Kerr has a post titled “Did Judge Reeves Reach the Correct Result in Jamison v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am
Pierre in turn relied on New York v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:14 am
” Kerr v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:23 pm
The Supreme Court is hearing a big CFAA case this fall, Van Buren v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
In Hill v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
[UPDATE: Orin Kerr is right that the decision is obviously redolent of Bush v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:47 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
Kerr. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
Montana State Fund DA 20-0113 2020 MT 159N Civil – Workers’ Compensation Marriage of Kerr DA 19-0276 2020 MT 158N Civil – Domestic Relations Harbour v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:30 am
” [Orin Kerr on Van Buren v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
” 1259: Lord Kerr thanks the parties for their submissions and brings proceedings to a close. 1258: Finally, Mr Hoskins QC says the issue of whether there is sufficient evidence to reach a conclusion on certification is unique to the facts of each case. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Kerr, delivering judgment, held that even if a presumption exists that Parliament intends Carltona to apply, it was displaced by a proper interpretation of articles 4(1) and 4 (2) of the 1972 Order read together. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
It does not mean that at the certification stage one has to show that all the loss has been passed on for the duration of the claim and to all members of that class. 14:54: Mr Hoskins QC concludes his submissions. 14:51: Lord Kerr questions how Mr Hoskins QC contends the Applicant could have overcome that test. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:31 am
Dorais and United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
Lady Hale gives the majority judgment, with which Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed. [read post]
