Search for: "Kerr v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 8:31 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Most fundamentally, I don’t think location information of phones is protected by the Fourth Amendment under Smith v.... [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:53 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The rare opportunity arose in American Fork City v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am by SHG
Miller, a pedestrian decision relating to information everyone knew was in the hands of third parties, rather than the outcome-dependent decision in Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:25 am
We agree with the District Court that this argument is foreclosed by Smith [v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Orin Kerr
According to Judge Leon, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:08 pm by David Lat
Marshall [SCOTUSblog] Bravo to the Justices for the New Audio Policy [Volokh Conspiracy (Orin Kerr) via Twitter (Kashmir Hill)]Earlier: Breaking: Ninth Circuit Stiffs Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate Prior ATL coverage of Anna Nicole Smith [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:41 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On Tuesday, DOJ filed a brief in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:37 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court declined to hear an unusual challenge to the program by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which had sought to bypass lower courts.ADDED: Orin Kerr has some sharp analysis:Judge Leon’s first and most fundamental move is to distinguish Smith v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Chronic Failure to Control Prisoner Isolation in US and Canadian Law Lisa Kerr, Assistant Professor, Queen’s University Faculty of Law(2015) Queen’s Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 482-530 Excerpt: Introduction, Sections II & V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) So holds a state court in People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
 The most apparent beneficiary of this willingness of the Courts to expand the scope of such relief would appear to be common law spouses (see the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Kerr v. [read post]