Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
Last month, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
Kerr argued for the losing citizen-accused and Fourth Amendment in Davis v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about a fascinating Fourth Amendment district court decision involving how the border search exception applies to computers, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) On November 8th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:17 am
(Photo by Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post) Another Supreme Court case I’ve been following this fall is co-blogger Orin Kerr’s favorite, Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
Jones Now let’s turn to United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:50 am
(Orin Kerr) A lot of the early press reports on United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Kerr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:46 am
The lawfulness of the cap was addressed by the Supreme Court in R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
Those same practitioners will also know that whilst Lord Kerr further states that compensation is by no means automatically payable for breach of the art 3 duty, it is not the award of general damages that chief constables will soon fear. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:55 pm
Readers who are following United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Id. at 16 (quoting Menard v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:47 pm
Maxwell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 10:17 pm
On January 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Kentucky v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:25 am
Law Lessons from RYAN KERR, ET AL. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:52 am
Kerr offered to the Justices in Davis v. [read post]
