Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
United States, the next year’s United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
[An overlooked part of United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am
Kerr-McGee, 291 Fed.App’x 626 (2008) (in which our firm represented the royalty owners). [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:36 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court handed down a new decision today, State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am
Judge Reeves assumes that whether an officer's physical intrusion into a car is reasonable is governed by a Fifth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:14 am
” Kerr v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:23 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
[UPDATE: Orin Kerr is right that the decision is obviously redolent of Bush v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:47 pm
Gore, you would have expected the state court to decide what kind of election recount state law permitted. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
Kerr. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
Montana State Fund DA 20-0113 2020 MT 159N Civil – Workers’ Compensation Marriage of Kerr DA 19-0276 2020 MT 158N Civil – Domestic Relations Harbour v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
” 1259: Lord Kerr thanks the parties for their submissions and brings proceedings to a close. 1258: Finally, Mr Hoskins QC says the issue of whether there is sufficient evidence to reach a conclusion on certification is unique to the facts of each case. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Kerr, delivering judgment, held that even if a presumption exists that Parliament intends Carltona to apply, it was displaced by a proper interpretation of articles 4(1) and 4 (2) of the 1972 Order read together. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
Mr Harris QC stated before the Tribunal that only [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:31 am
Dorais and United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
Lady Hale gives the majority judgment, with which Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed. [read post]
