Search for: "Kerr v. United States District Court"
Results 301 - 320
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
As the Supreme Court demonstrated in DC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 6:20 pm
United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297, 321–24 (1972) (national security); Camara v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:01 pm
Holder, from Judge Kessler of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, who concludes the mandate is constitutional. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
§ 1441(a), which allows removal of civil actions “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
Supreme Court offered in a majority opinion just a few months ago in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court offered in a majority opinion just a few months ago in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
(ellipsis in original)); see also United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:01 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
Pickar, 616 F.3d 821, 827 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
When Orin Kerr noted the unusual opinion out of Fourth District Court of Appeals in Florida in Ruiz v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about a fascinating Fourth Amendment district court decision involving how the border search exception applies to computers, United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
United States, 642 F. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:29 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) The DC Circuit has just noted on its docket that it has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
United States, the Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell case, reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
Any voluntary statements made by the suspect shall be admissible in any prosecution thereafter brought by the United States or by the District of Columbia. [read post]
