Search for: "Kier v. Kier" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 3:12 am
Veakins v Kier Islington Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1288; [2009] WLR (D) 353 "In many cases the remedy for high-handed or discriminatory misconduct by or on behalf of an employer would be more fittingly in the employment tribunal rather than by recourse to a claim for damages for the statutory tort of harassment. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 4:44 pm
But heck, we're willing to make some, so here's a link to our photos:  [www.shorl.com]  Kirby v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:48 am
High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Kier Regional Ltd (t/a Wallis) v City & General (Holborn) Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 2454 (TCC) (17 October 2008) Source: www.bailii.org        [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:40 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuehne & Ors v Revenue and Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 34 (26 January 2012) Mugweni v NHS London [2011] EWCA Civ 20 (26 January 2012) AA (Iraq), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 23 (24 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Rehman v Brady, The Estate of & Anor [2012] EWHC 78 (QB) (25 January 2012) Bennett v Stephens & Anor [2012] EWHC 58… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:02 pm by thelawprofessor
Wikipedia tells me that Kier and Mike left Jelsoft on June 19, 2009. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:44 am
DC Comics (2003) 30 Cal.4th 881 and Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 12:48 pm by Carolyn E. Wright
Thanks to Howard Kier for suggesting this topic. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 2:30 am by Michael Scutt
The recent case of Judy Veakins v Kier Islington Limited [2009], recently heard before the Court of Appeal (CA), has been cited as threatening to raise the temperature again on this difficult issue, by holding that Ms Veakins had been the victim of "oppressive, unreasonable and criminal (behaviour)". [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
’ The investigation tracked five units designed to tackle fake news, which were found to have monitored comments that criticised the government, including statements made by Sir Kier Starmer, academics from Oxford University and UCL, and the Big Brother Watch staff. [read post]