Search for: "Kimbell v. Kimbell"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2022, 1:50 am
© 2021 Jane Lambert: All rights reservedJane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr John Kimbell QC) Vimage Products Ltd. v Data Candy Ltd and others [2022] EWHC 606 (IOEC) (18 March 2022_Sometimes, through no fault of its own, a claimant joins someone who was not responsible for the alleged wrongdoing as a defendant. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:44 am
Author Paste Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Soutce Wikimedia Jane Lambertintellectual Property Enterprise Court (John Kimbell QC) Photobooth Props Ltd and another v NEPBH Ltd and others [2022] EWHC 750 (IPEC) (1 April 2022)These were interlocutory applications by both claimants and defendants in an action for copyright infringement and rescission of a contract. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:34 pm
Kimbell, Civil No. 07-1871-HA. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
In this case involving the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act, Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club North Star Chapter, and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness (collectively Wilderness Watch) brought suit against Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service, and Ed Schafer, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (collectively Forest Service), alleging that the Forest Service's decision to construct a certain snowmobile trail between McFarland Lake… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:15 pm
Oct 18: In the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:44 am
The petition can be viewed here: Addax v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
Kimbell et al, Civil No. 07-1871-SU,, 2008 WL 4186913 (D.Or. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am
Mar 4: In the U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 12:05 pm
Kimbell et al. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:40 pm
Third, the Supreme Court should replace the rule from Klaxon v. [read post]
UK court discusses copyright protection of fictional characters and defences for parody and pastiche
9 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In a judgment handed down yesterday - Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379 (IPEC) - the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) answered 'yes' and applied guidance derived from EU law, including the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Cofemel (Katposts here).Let's see what happened.BackgroundOnly Fools and Horses (OFAH) is a successful BBC TV series that ran between 1981 and 1991, with also some Christmas… [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 US 715 (1979). [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:49 am
Silvers v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
Stuart v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Kimbell Foods, federal law frequently incorporates state property law and state contract law. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm
Paul Guardian Insurance Company v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:24 am
Counsel for WFS was Paul Henton (instructed by Reed Smith) and counsel for Carnival/P&O were John Kimbell QC and Celine Honey (instructed by Watson Farley & Williams). [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
No time to rebrand as 21 week delay to injunction refusedCombe International LLC v Dr August Wolff GmbH [2022] EWHC 125 (Ch) (January 2022)We covered the hoo-ha between VAGISIL and VAGISAN in the last volume. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 U.S. 715, 1979.) 39 Sw. [read post]
