Search for: "Kimble v. Kimble" Results 101 - 120 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 7:42 pm
" Paige Lavender of The Huffington Post reports that "Elena Kagan Fills Kimble v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
The Court heard nine cases during the March session when Michigan v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Justice Breyer put it, quoting from a past majority opinion in Kimble v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm by Mark Walsh
The Court takes the bench just a few seconds after ten o’clock, and Justice Elena Kagan has the opinion in Kimble v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Amy Howe
In the wake of the Court’s decision in Kimble v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-01-01: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-12-31: Forum sele… http://t.co/kj3Cljc2IO -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-01-01 http://t.co/ir3IhsIGyv -> Copyright 2014: the year in review http://t.co/l7Rg3ArxrG -> blogged: Copyright 2014: the year in review http://t.co/Vr7WN2WLm6 -> Copyright 2014: the year in review: As the creative industries continued to grow economically in importance in…… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Kimble v Marvel Entertainment: when post-expiry patent royalties meet stare decisisThe unsatisfying U.S. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:41 am by Immigration Prof
Immprofs -- you may have received a recent copy of The Scribes Journal of Legal Writing in your faculty inbox. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
” In the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports on yesterday’s oral arguments in the patent case Kimble v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:39 pm by Josh Blackman
S., at ___−___ (slip op., at 5–9) (ALITO, J., dissenting); see also Kimble v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
Simplicity Trumps Logical Coherence Monday, July 6, 2015  |  Jonathan Mincer In Kimble v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
Meanwhile, on the PatLit blog, David Berry reports on yet another patent case that the US Supreme Court is happy to hear, Kimble v Marvel Enterprises, which will revisit the rule in Brulotte v Thys and the endearing practice of extracting royalty payments from a licensee after the patent has expired (this patent involves a Spiderman toy, if you were wondering). [read post]